Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing · Oregon

Lochmead Dairy INC

Junction City, OR · ~61 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lochmead Dairy INC runs at 368% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Lochmead Dairy INC: 12.1 TCR = 368% of Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lochmead Dairy INC safety composite

Lochmead Dairy INC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2022

Lochmead Dairy INC injury rate improved

Lochmead Dairy INC's TCR fell 1.6 from 11.5 in 2016 to 9.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 18.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.5 · 2017=11.0 · 2018=18.6 · 2019=13.5 · 2020=8.2 · 2022=9.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311511 · Junction City, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.1 · 368% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #10/10
  • PHOTO UNC - Rochester Plan…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UNC - Rochester Plant & Distribution (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Lochmead Dairy INC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lochmead Dairy INC averages 12.1 TCR (368% of the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lochmead Dairy INC TCR series: 2016=11.5 · 2017=11 · 2018=18.6 · 2019=13.5 · 2020=8.2 · 2022=9.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Lochmead Dairy INC falls in its industry

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 10 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin employers in Oregon.

Lochmead Dairy INC (61 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lochmead Dairy INC
Lochmead Dairy INC (61 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Lochmead Dairy INC has fewer employees than the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 9.9 5.0 5 1 0
2020 8.2 5.0 5 0 0
2019 13.5 10.1 8 0 0
2018 18.6 18.6 12 0 0
2017 11.0 11.0 7 0 0
2016 11.5 6.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311511 · OR · Junction City

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 23 employers in Junction City, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UNC - Rochester Plant & Distribution 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hastings Co-op Creamery 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc.-Peoria 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southeast Milk, Inc Ultra Filtration Plant 12.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cherry Valley Orchard, Inc. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spring Creek Gardens, Inc. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lebanon 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Horizon Forestry, LLC 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oregon State Hospital-Junction City Campus 403 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guaranty RV 361 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0019-0019-00386 FAC-00386-JUNCTION CITY-OR 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-00386 147 FTE
NAT-TCR Darlington County Water & Sewer Authority 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Regency 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR US Foods Everett 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Newport Commissary 12.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plant 5 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #726 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Automotosports Inc. 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tosca - Sharonville 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.