Employer · Florida

Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321)

Jacksonville, FL · ~95 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321) runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321): 2.0 TCR = 45% of industry BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321) safety composite

Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2019

Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321) injury rate improved

Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321)'s TCR fell 1.1 from 4.1 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Jacksonville, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 45% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #57/137
  • PHOTO North State Aviation
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: North State Aviation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321) averages 2.0 TCR (45% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321) TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=1 · 2019=3 · BLS 4.5

Where Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321) falls in its industry

992 industry establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 137 industry employers in Florida.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321) (95 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321)
Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321) (95 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321) has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.0 3.0 3 0 0
2018 1.0 0.0 0 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.1 3.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · FL · Jacksonville

992 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR North State Aviation 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9123-SJC-PRIME APPEARANCE 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chromalloy Georgia 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Textron Aviation - CSC Orlando 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Railroad Nursery, Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacobs - PEMBROKE PINES -OMI 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE HOTEL 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orlando 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR Buchheit Corporate Office 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 032 ABC Supply Co., Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Market Basket #1 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Victory Packaging Boston 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE RMDS Indianapolis 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenville GRN 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Chemical East Rutherford 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadow Burke - Fort Worth MFG 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.