Employer · Alabama

Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595)

Courtland, AL · ~176 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595) runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595): 0.3 TCR = 10% of industry BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595) safety composite

Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595): 0.0 → 0.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 0.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595)'s TCR rose 0.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336414 · Courtland, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO Raytheon_Tewksbury_MA
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~176 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Raytheon_Tewksbury_MA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595) averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.8 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595) falls in its industry

82 industry establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 industry employers in Alabama.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595) (176 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595)
Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595) (176 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595) has fewer employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.0 3 0 0
2023 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.8 0.4 1 1 0
2020 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336414 · AL · Courtland

82 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_Tewksbury_MA 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Cape Canaveral Air Force Statn (1259) 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Kennedy Space Campus (1337) 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Chelmsford (1553) 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gulf Electric Company Inc., of Mobile 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Honda Lock Selma AL 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Busche Alabama 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 0842 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Servico 30 FTE
NAT-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Cape Canaveral Air Force Statn (1259) 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Starcon - North 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Owens Corning - Amarillo, TX 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cust-O-Fab Specialty Services 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Electric Automation Fort Loramie 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pitt Ohio - Cleveland 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Hope 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE KA Newco 176 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.