Employer · Georgia

Lockheed Martin Corporation Kings Bay Campus (1559)

Kings Bay, GA · ~555 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lockheed Martin Corporation Kings Bay Campus (1559) runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Kings Bay Campus (1559): 1.4 TCR = 43% of industry BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lockheed Martin Corporation Kings Bay Campus (1559) safety composite

Lockheed Martin Corporation Kings Bay Campus (1559) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2024

Lockheed Martin Corporation Kings Bay Campus (1559) injury rate improved

Lockheed Martin Corporation Kings Bay Campus (1559)'s TCR fell 0.7 from 1.1 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.2 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336414 · Kings Bay, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK P38
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~555 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation Troy Campus (1046) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Lockheed Martin Corporation Kings Bay Campus (1559) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lockheed Martin Corporation Kings Bay Campus (1559) averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lockheed Martin Corporation Kings Bay Campus (1559) TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.2 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Lockheed Martin Corporation Kings Bay Campus (1559) falls in its industry

82 industry establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Lockheed Martin Corporation Kings Bay Campus (1559) (555 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Lockheed Martin Corporation Kings Bay Campus (1559)
Lockheed Martin Corporation Kings Bay Campus (1559) (555 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Lockheed Martin Corporation Kings Bay Campus (1559) has more employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.2 2 0 0
2023 1.9 0.7 11 0 0
2022 1.2 0.5 3 4 0
2020 2.2 1.0 13 0 0
2019 1.8 0.7 11 0 0
2018 1.4 0.5 8 0 0
2017 1.4 0.9 8 0 0
2016 1.1 0.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336414 · GA · Kings Bay

82 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 10 employers in Kings Bay, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Troy Campus (1046) 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LA002 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Virgin Orbit 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR OLS Launch Complex 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hoshizaki America, Inc. Peachtree City Facility 555 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6485 556 FTE
STATE-SIZE US GA Atlanta Office 02 554 FTE
STATE-SIZE Customer Care Center Distribution Control Center Henry Co 553 FTE
CITY-NEAR HGAKB03 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR CL Coatings, LLC - Kings Bay 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR HGAKB01 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-X050 44 FTE
NAT-TCR Stolle Machinery - Dayton 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lebanon (BAMG) 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MH Bowling Greeen 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fredericksburg 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE MECA 555 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paul Mueller Company 555 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rolling Hills Casino 555 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stuarts Draft 555 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.