Employer · California

Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Cruz Campus (1574)

Santa Cruz, CA · ~101 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Cruz Campus (1574) runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade B.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Cruz Campus (1574): 2.2 TCR = 65% of industry BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Cruz Campus (1574) safety composite

Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Cruz Campus (1574) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Cruz Campus (1574): 0.0 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 5.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.47× in 2024

Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Cruz Campus (1574)'s TCR rose 3.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336414 · Santa Cruz, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 65% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #14/19
  • PHOTO Raytheon Redstone
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Raytheon Redstone (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Cruz Campus (1574) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Cruz Campus (1574) averages 2.2 TCR (65% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Cruz Campus (1574) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.8 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Cruz Campus (1574) falls in its industry

82 industry establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 19 industry employers in California.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Cruz Campus (1574) (101 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Cruz Campus (1574)
Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Cruz Campus (1574) (101 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Cruz Campus (1574) has fewer employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 1.0 3 0 0
2023 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2022 5.5 4.6 1 5 0
2020 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2017 4.2 3.2 4 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336414 · CA · Santa Cruz

82 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 133 employers in Santa Cruz, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Raytheon Redstone 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Relativity Space 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TSC,LLC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGTS-S950 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kirschenmann Farms, Inc 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE M & R Company 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Sun Grower Services 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Camacho FLC, Inc 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Santa Cruz 8,081 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030253 1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dignity Health Dominican Hospital 1,652 FTE
CITY-NEAR 64030253-253001 DOMINICAN HOSPITAL SANTA CRUZ 1,464 FTE
NAT-TCR R. J. Corman Railroad Services, Emergency, LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lincolnton 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR VDF Singer 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Washington, DC 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northwestern Indiana Telephone Company 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phoenix Products RPC 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alter Trading - STL Corporate Office 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metropolitan Environmental Services 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.