Acoustical system engineering design services · Florida

Lockheed Martin Corporation Titusville (1105)

Titusville, FL · ~262 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lockheed Martin Corporation Titusville (1105) runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Acoustical system engineering design services workplace, earning a grade A.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Titusville (1105): 0.1 TCR = 22% of Acoustical system engineering design services BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lockheed Martin Corporation Titusville (1105) safety composite

Lockheed Martin Corporation Titusville (1105) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lockheed Martin Corporation Titusville (1105) held a steady TCR band

Lockheed Martin Corporation Titusville (1105)'s TCR held near 0.3 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.3 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 3.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · Titusville, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #2/33
  • PHOTO Honeywell Aerospace …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~262 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Honeywell Aerospace PR- Aguadilla (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Lockheed Martin Corporation Titusville (1105) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lockheed Martin Corporation Titusville (1105) averages 0.1 TCR (22% of the Acoustical system engineering design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lockheed Martin Corporation Titusville (1105) TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.3 · BLS 0.5

Where Lockheed Martin Corporation Titusville (1105) falls in its industry

690 Acoustical system engineering establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 33 Acoustical system engineering employers in Florida.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Titusville (1105) (262 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lockheed Martin Corporation Titusville (1105)
Lockheed Martin Corporation Titusville (1105) (262 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Lockheed Martin Corporation Titusville (1105) has more employees than the Acoustical system engineering design ser median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.3 0.3 0 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · FL · Titusville

690 Acoustical system engineering design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 70 employers in Titusville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Honeywell Aerospace PR- Aguadilla 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GKN Automotive North America 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arinc Incoporated (Annapolis MD) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DCS-Americas - Southeast Region 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sofidel America - Haines City, FL 262 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quality Custom Distribution 262 FTE
STATE-SIZE Toyota of Tampa Bay 262 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tower Eight Staffing Solutions dba Labor For Hire - Hialeah 262 FTE
CITY-NEAR 649 418 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 649 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Titusville (1105) 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southeast Power Corporation 366 FTE
NAT-TCR 2573-MN103 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR OIS-Corpus Christi 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shure Incorporated 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Inogen, Inc. 4 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE WSI- Jenks 262 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madden's on Gull Lake 262 FTE
NAT-SIZE 416551-Phi-Main Office Sta 262 FTE
NAT-SIZE Entegris, Inc Colorado Springs 262 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.