Employer · Pennsylvania

Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029)

King of Prussia, PA · ~2,070 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029): 0.2 TCR = 32% of industry BLS 0.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) safety composite

Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) held a steady TCR band

Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029)'s TCR held near 0.2 from 0.3 in 2016 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.3 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.2 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · King of Prussia, PA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/7
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~2,070 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Colorado Spgs Federal Dr (1617) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) averages 0.2 TCR (32% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) TCR series: 2016=0.3 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.2 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 0.5

Where Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) falls in its industry

181 industry establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 7 industry employers in Pennsylvania.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) (2,070 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029)
Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) (2,070 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.0 3 0 0
2023 0.1 0.0 3 0 0
2022 0.3 0.2 3 3 0
2020 0.2 0.1 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2016 0.3 0.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · PA · King of Prussia

181 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 183 employers in King of Prussia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Colorado Spgs Federal Dr (1617) 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FE9 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NY21 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Panasonic Avionics Corporation Irvine 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE UPMC Passavant 2,070 FTE
STATE-SIZE PANST - NEW STANTON 2,068 FTE
STATE-SIZE AHN SYSTEMWIDE SERVICES/CORPORATE SERVICES 2,084 FTE
STATE-SIZE DePuy Synthes West Chester 2,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR 199897 9,243 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSL Behring, King of Prussia 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DPH2 1,109 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arkema Inc - KOP 848 FTE
NAT-TCR Dart Container Corporate Offices 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilson, NC Facility 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Symbotic Headquarters 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 2 Lincoln Center 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sentara Leigh Hospital 2,070 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arnett Hospital 2,070 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norton Audubon Hospital AUD 2,069 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ingram barge Company 2,071 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.