Other Direct Selling Establishments · Texas

Lone Star Cold Storage - Richardson

Richardson, TX · ~62 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lone Star Cold Storage - Richardson runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Other Direct Selling Establishments workplace, earning a grade A.

Lone Star Cold Storage - Richardson: 1.4 TCR = 40% of Other Direct Selling Establishments BLS 3.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lone Star Cold Storage - Richardson safety composite

Lone Star Cold Storage - Richardson scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2020

Lone Star Cold Storage - Richardson injury rate improved

Lone Star Cold Storage - Richardson's TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 454390 · Richardson, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/17
  • PHOTO LINO LAKES, MN - RET…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LINO LAKES, MN - RETAIL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Lone Star Cold Storage - Richardson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lone Star Cold Storage - Richardson averages 1.4 TCR (40% of the Other Direct Selling Establishments BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lone Star Cold Storage - Richardson TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.4

Where Lone Star Cold Storage - Richardson falls in its industry

212 Other Direct Selling Establish establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 17 Other Direct Selling Establish employers in Texas.

Lone Star Cold Storage - Richardson (62 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lone Star Cold Storage - Richardson
Lone Star Cold Storage - Richardson (62 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Lone Star Cold Storage - Richardson has more employees than the Other Direct Selling Establishments median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2017 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2016 2.3 2.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

454390 · TX · Richardson

212 Other Direct Selling Establishments employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 220 employers in Richardson, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LINO LAKES, MN - RETAIL 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR cabi, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR EUGENE, OR/CASCADES DISTRICT 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pampered Chef Headquarters 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE EP Energy - Eagle Ford (Dilley) 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Dog Drilling 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koserca Headquearters 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monahans 2790 South Wilma, Monahans, TX 79756 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Safety-Kleen Systems Inc 2,858 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Richardson Medical Center 1,932 FTE
CITY-NEAR RFAB 1,309 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-TEXAS.RICHARDSON 1,266 FTE
NAT-TCR Loews New Orleans Hotel 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 266368-Eagan Solutions Center 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1325 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 779 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sheldon Laboratory Systems, LLC 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE REN151 Orange County 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE My Mother's Delicacies, Inc. 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : BHM - Birmingham 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.