Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Texas

Lone Star Paving - Jung Road

San Antonio, TX · ~186 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lone Star Paving - Jung Road runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Lone Star Paving - Jung Road: 2.2 TCR = 79% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lone Star Paving - Jung Road safety composite

Lone Star Paving - Jung Road scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2022→2024

Lone Star Paving - Jung Road injury rate improved

Lone Star Paving - Jung Road's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.6 in 2022 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.6 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · San Antonio, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #149/286
  • PHOTO Ranger Construction_…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~186 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ranger Construction_West Palm Beach (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Lone Star Paving - Jung Road in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lone Star Paving - Jung Road averages 2.2 TCR (79% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lone Star Paving - Jung Road TCR series: 2022=2.6 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Lone Star Paving - Jung Road falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #149 safest of 286 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Texas.

Lone Star Paving - Jung Road (186 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Lone Star Paving - Jung Road
Lone Star Paving - Jung Road (186 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Lone Star Paving - Jung Road has more employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2023 3.5 2.0 7 0 0
2022 2.6 1.0 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · TX · San Antonio

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ranger Construction_West Palm Beach 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palmer Paving Corp. Road Construction and Support Office 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Banks Construction Company 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR TRAFFIC HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE LLC 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE PEC-Headquarters 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHTEX of Texas, Inc. - Austin 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanchette Field Services 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE Large Projects-Central Region 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HSL1 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Center at Val Vista 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR ChildServe Center 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1062 Long Beach 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Modine Manufacturing Company - Trenton 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Glen Ellyn 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DCL9 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE 193 - Lake Orion 186 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.