Drywall and related building materials distributor · Texas

Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street

San Antonio, TX · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Drywall and related building materials distributor workplace, earning a grade D.

Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street: 3.7 TCR = 169% of Drywall and related building materials distributor BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street safety composite

Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street: 0.0 → 7.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.09× in 2024

Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street's TCR rose 7.8 from 0.0 in 2022 to 7.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423310 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.7 · 169% of ind

  • DART 7.8 DART
  • RANK #69/149
  • PHOTO Taylor Cotton & Ridl…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Taylor Cotton & Ridley, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street averages 3.7 TCR (169% of the Drywall and related building materials distributor BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=7.8 · BLS 2.2

Where Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street falls in its industry

1,225 Drywall and related building m establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 149 Drywall and related building m employers in Texas.

Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street (29 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street
Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street (29 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street has fewer employees than the Drywall and related building materials d median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.8 7.8 2 0 0
2023 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423310 · TX · San Antonio

1,225 Drywall and related building materials distributor employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Taylor Cotton & Ridley, Inc 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kansas City - BMD 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Masonite Distribution (BWI) Branchburg 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodson Lumber Company of Brenham, Inc. 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepper Dairy 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE SROOC Holding LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Logging, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Clarinda Regional Health Center 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ho-Chunk Gaming Madison 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lci 119 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hercules Manufacturing Company 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Commonwealth Harrisonburg 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hardy Paramount 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tucker Columbia 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE LNL Anodizing Inc 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.