Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Texas

Longhorn Plant

Fort Worth, TX · ~105 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Longhorn Plant runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade A.

Longhorn Plant: 0.7 TCR = 21% of Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Longhorn Plant safety composite

Longhorn Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Longhorn Plant held a steady TCR band

Longhorn Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/46
  • PHOTO VAM USA Miller
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VAM USA Miller (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Longhorn Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Longhorn Plant averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Longhorn Plant TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Longhorn Plant falls in its industry

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 46 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Texas.

Longhorn Plant (105 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Longhorn Plant
Longhorn Plant (105 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Longhorn Plant has more employees than the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2021 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2020 1.5 0.8 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · TX · Fort Worth

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VAM USA Miller 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allied Tube and Conduit 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Republic Conduit Manufacturing, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tenaris Bay City 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE NAUR Pecos Office 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Texas District 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harrington Station-031 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Galaxy Builders Ltd. 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Applied Materials 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hitt Electric Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Transport Service 60325 - Nitro 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nestle Purina Clinton IA 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlanta Roofing Plant 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE West River Health Campus 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silver Oaks 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hearthstone Health Campus 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.