Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Texas

Longview Children and Family Services

Longview, TX · ~32 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Longview Children and Family Services runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade D.

Longview Children and Family Services: 5.5 TCR = 146% of Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Longview Children and Family Services safety composite

Longview Children and Family Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Longview Children and Family Services: 4.1 → 7.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 7.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2018

Longview Children and Family Services's TCR rose 2.9 from 4.1 in 2016 to 7.0 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621330 · Longview, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 146% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO SequelCare of Florida
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SequelCare of Florida (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Longview Children and Family Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Longview Children and Family Services averages 5.5 TCR (146% of the Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Longview Children and Family Services TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2018=7 · BLS 3.8

Where Longview Children and Family Services falls in its industry

137 Social workers' , mental healt establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Social workers' , mental healt employers in Texas.

Longview Children and Family Services (32 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Longview Children and Family Services
Longview Children and Family Services (32 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Longview Children and Family Services has fewer employees than the Social workers' , mental health, offices median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 7.0 0.0 2 0 0
2016 4.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621330 · TX · Longview

137 Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 259 employers in Longview, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SequelCare of Florida 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BII PA Exton 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR HSC 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bellefaire JCB - Lorain Campus 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heifer Ranch at Arroyo Seco, LTD 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Coyote Ranch 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Tulia 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Feather Crest Farm 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longview - GSMC 155 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Shepherd Medical Center - Longview 1,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Chemical Company 1,535 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Operations 1,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Jacksonville (Flwrd) 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR R+L Carriers - KAN 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SMF - Airport United Airlines Offices 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Spangler Graphics 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Relay Express Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE TPH 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roofing Contractor 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alliance Industries - Marinette 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.