Electric Power Distribution · Florida

Longwood Operations Complex

Longwood, FL · ~55 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Longwood Operations Complex runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade C.

Longwood Operations Complex: 1.1 TCR = 88% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Longwood Operations Complex safety composite

Longwood Operations Complex scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Longwood Operations Complex held a steady TCR band

Longwood Operations Complex's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Longwood, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.1 · 88% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #50/135
  • PHOTO FSC - Front Street
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FSC - Front Street (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Longwood Operations Complex in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Longwood Operations Complex averages 1.1 TCR (88% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Longwood Operations Complex TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=2 · 2022=2 · 2023=2 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Longwood Operations Complex falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 135 Electric Power Distribution employers in Florida.

Longwood Operations Complex (55 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Longwood Operations Complex
Longwood Operations Complex (55 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Longwood Operations Complex has fewer employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · FL · Longwood

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 82 employers in Longwood, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FSC - Front Street 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MISSOURI RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Iowa City Service Center 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Durham Operations Center 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE BBTS 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jay Plant 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anclote Fossil Plant 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Systems Operations 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Seminole Hospital 1,075 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLLON - LONGWOOD CENTER 791 FTE
CITY-NEAR LONGWOOD CENTER (FLLON) 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Headquarters 443 FTE
NAT-TCR Fairfax 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Durham Operations Center 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ATI Huntsville Operations 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Valtronic Technologies (USA), Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Flash Fast Logistics LLC 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edgewood Point 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE AT T EECC Rooms Dep 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Olema Lodge 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.