Charter bus services (except scenic, sightseeing) · California

Loop Transportation, Inc (Google)

Mountain View, CA · ~140 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Loop Transportation, Inc (Google) runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Charter bus services (except scenic, sightseeing) workplace, earning a grade C.

Loop Transportation, Inc (Google): 4.6 TCR = 102% of Charter bus services (except scenic, sightseeing) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Loop Transportation, Inc (Google) safety composite

Loop Transportation, Inc (Google) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.2

2018→2020

Loop Transportation, Inc (Google) injury rate improved

Loop Transportation, Inc (Google)'s TCR fell 9.2 from 9.2 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.2 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485510 · Mountain View, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.6 · 102% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/21
  • PHOTO Peoria Charter Coach…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~140 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Peoria Charter Coach Company Urbana Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Loop Transportation, Inc (Google) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Loop Transportation, Inc (Google) averages 4.6 TCR (102% of the Charter bus services (except scenic, sightseeing) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Loop Transportation, Inc (Google) TCR series: 2018=9.2 · 2020=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Loop Transportation, Inc (Google) falls in its industry

169 Charter bus services (except s establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 21 Charter bus services (except s employers in California.

Loop Transportation, Inc (Google) (140 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Loop Transportation, Inc (Google)
Loop Transportation, Inc (Google) (140 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Loop Transportation, Inc (Google) has more employees than the Charter bus services (except scenic, sig median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.2 2.0 7 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485510 · CA · Mountain View

169 Charter bus services (except scenic, sightseeing) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 151 employers in Mountain View, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Peoria Charter Coach Company Urbana Facility 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Polynesian Adventure Tours - Big Island 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lux Bus America Hearst 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eyre Bus Tour & Travel 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mirabella Farms, Inc. 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Precooling 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meadowlark Harvesting, Inc 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-Saddleback S/C 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waymo HQ 1,846 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waymo RLS 1,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Bay Medical Foundation (30806) 1,158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-30331) 999 FTE
NAT-TCR New Haven - QRP 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Boyer's Food Markets -Bernville 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohio Paperboard 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR OTSCON, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Industries of Central NC -Corporate, #011, #027, #099, #208 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE LuLu's Landing, Inc. 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arizona Wholesale Supply Company 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE D02 Long Island 140 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.