Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing · Florida

Loos & Co (Cableware)

Naples, FL · ~62 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Loos & Co (Cableware) runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Loos & Co (Cableware): 2.5 TCR = 77% of Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Loos & Co (Cableware) safety composite

Loos & Co (Cableware) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Loos & Co (Cableware): 1.6 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.63× in 2022

Loos & Co (Cableware)'s TCR rose 1.6 from 1.6 in 2019 to 3.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Naples, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #19/30
  • PHOTO Spirit Aerosystems O…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spirit Aerosystems Oklahoma (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Loos & Co (Cableware) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Loos & Co (Cableware) averages 2.5 TCR (77% of the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Loos & Co (Cableware) TCR series: 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Loos & Co (Cableware) falls in its industry

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 30 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. employers in Florida.

Loos & Co (Cableware) (62 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Loos & Co (Cableware)
Loos & Co (Cableware) (62 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Loos & Co (Cableware) has fewer employees than the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dus median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.2 1.6 2 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2020 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · FL · Naples

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 359 employers in Naples, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spirit Aerosystems Oklahoma 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weaver Manufacturing, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moog, Inc. - Torrance 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SNA - Auburn 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 88 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE SCS Southern Customer Service 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walsingham Complex 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stuart Service Center 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Naples Community Hospital, Inc. 2,925 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Health Naples 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arthrex, Inc. 1,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCH Health System North Naples Hospital 1,021 FTE
NAT-TCR FPSS 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Geisel Heating and Air Conditioning 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Clayton Industries (COI) 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1516 - Biddeford 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eau Claire Travel Center 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harold Zeigler Plainwell Chrysler 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Arecibo 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lindenmeyr Central Islip 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.