General warehousing and storage · Arkansas

L'Oreal - North Little Rock Distribution

North Little Rock, AR · ~244 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

L'Oreal - North Little Rock Distribution runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

L'Oreal - North Little Rock Distribution: 1.2 TCR = 21% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

L'Oreal - North Little Rock Distribution safety composite

L'Oreal - North Little Rock Distribution scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2022

L'Oreal - North Little Rock Distribution injury rate improved

L'Oreal - North Little Rock Distribution's TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=2.3 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · North Little Rock, AR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/58
  • PHOTO Rojas
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~244 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rojas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

L'Oreal - North Little Rock Distribution in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows L'Oreal - North Little Rock Distribution averages 1.2 TCR (21% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

L'Oreal - North Little Rock Distribution TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=2.3 · 2022=0 · BLS 5.8

Where L'Oreal - North Little Rock Distribution falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 58 General warehousing and storag employers in Arkansas.

L'Oreal - North Little Rock Distribution (244 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate L'Oreal - North Little Rock Distribution
L'Oreal - North Little Rock Distribution (244 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

L'Oreal - North Little Rock Distribution has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.3 0.0 3 1 0
2019 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2018 0.7 0.0 2 0 0
2017 2.4 1.6 6 0 0
2016 1.7 1.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · AR · North Little Rock

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 149 employers in North Little Rock, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rojas 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stericycle - Aurora,IL 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR GA - Brass Craft 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilmer Warehouse S2U 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 160 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE 71 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shine Solar 243 FTE
STATE-SIZE 025-00625 245 FTE
CITY-NEAR AR Little Rock 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maverick North Little Rock, AR 1,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR EngageMED 1,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Medical Center - North Little Rock 1,002 FTE
NAT-TCR 2967-NY56 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 3495-12D8521 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Swansea Rural King 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6768-67680052-MSDC 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cardinal FG -Mooresville FG 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE SPPR Clean Fleet 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE AGCO : Batavia 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilkesboro Fresh Plant II 244 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.