Public warehousing and storage, refrigerated · California

Los Angeles Cold Storage Company

Los Angeles, CA · ~73 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Los Angeles Cold Storage Company runs at 139% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Public warehousing and storage, refrigerated workplace, earning a grade D.

Los Angeles Cold Storage Company: 8.0 TCR = 139% of Public warehousing and storage, refrigerated BLS 5.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Los Angeles Cold Storage Company safety composite

Los Angeles Cold Storage Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.2

2017→2024

Los Angeles Cold Storage Company injury rate improved

Los Angeles Cold Storage Company's TCR fell 9.2 from 10.6 in 2017 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 15.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.6 · 2018=10.1 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=15.8 · 2022=13.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.0 · 139% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #107/125
  • PHOTO Olathe Distribution …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Olathe Distribution Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Los Angeles Cold Storage Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Los Angeles Cold Storage Company averages 8.0 TCR (139% of the Public warehousing and storage, refrigerated BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Los Angeles Cold Storage Company TCR series: 2017=10.6 · 2018=10.1 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=15.8 · 2022=13.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 5.8

Where Los Angeles Cold Storage Company falls in its industry

1,039 Public warehousing and storage establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 125 Public warehousing and storage employers in California.

Los Angeles Cold Storage Company (73 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Los Angeles Cold Storage Company
Los Angeles Cold Storage Company (73 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Los Angeles Cold Storage Company has more employees than the Public warehousing and storage, refriger median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 13.2 8.2 8 0 0
2021 15.8 9.5 10 0 0
2020 7.6 6.1 5 0 0
2019 5.7 4.3 3 1 0
2018 10.1 8.6 7 0 0
2017 10.6 7.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · CA · Los Angeles

1,039 Public warehousing and storage, refrigerated employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Olathe Distribution Center 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sedalia Freezer 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cheney Brothers - Punta Gorda 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indianapolis Distribution Ctr 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Columbia 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Location 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE P-R Farms Inc/Palomate Inc 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR HP Hood LLC - Vernon Plant 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Doneff Companies LLC 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Waterloo Ia - 247 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1127 Tul2 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Konz Wood Products 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE J&S Construction 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Complete Packaging 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Complete Logistics Solutions LLC 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.