Service Establishment Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers of Equipment · California

Los Angeles

Cypress, CA · ~66 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Los Angeles runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Service Establishment Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers of Equipment workplace, earning a grade B.

Los Angeles: 1.4 TCR = 65% of Service Establishment Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers of Equipment BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Los Angeles safety composite

Los Angeles scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2018→2024

Los Angeles injury rate improved

Los Angeles's TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.9 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423850 · Cypress, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/22
  • PHOTO 733
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 733 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Los Angeles in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Los Angeles averages 1.4 TCR (65% of the Service Establishment Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers of Equipment BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Los Angeles TCR series: 2018=1.9 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Los Angeles falls in its industry

253 Service Establishment Equipmen establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 22 Service Establishment Equipmen employers in California.

Los Angeles (66 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Los Angeles
Los Angeles (66 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Los Angeles has more employees than the Service Establishment Equipment and Supp median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2020 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2019 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2018 1.9 1.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423850 · CA · Cypress

253 Service Establishment Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers of Equipment employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 65 employers in Cypress, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 733 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glory Global Solutions Inc - Carrollton Operations 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MD051 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Batesville Manufacturing (+SSB) 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nuseed Americas, Inc., West Sacramento Innovation Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ORGANIC BUNCH HARVESTING 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Navco Berry Harvest 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE kings orchards, llc 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR B2B Staffing Services Inc 433 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA - Cypress 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0748 - CYPRESS CA WHSE 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles CA Branch 342 FTE
NAT-TCR Dick Anderson Construction 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Klumb Lumber - Covington 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cupertino Electric, Inc. - Utah Operations 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR J Severino Construction 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE September Ends Co 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Certified Fireproofing, Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smg Kulpsville LLC 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kitchen Fabricating Equipment - Counter Craft 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.