Commercial building construction general contractors · Texas

Lott Brothers Construction Company, Ltd.

Austin, TX · ~33 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lott Brothers Construction Company, Ltd. runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Lott Brothers Construction Company, Ltd.: 3.1 TCR = 107% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lott Brothers Construction Company, Ltd. safety composite

Lott Brothers Construction Company, Ltd. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lott Brothers Construction Company, Ltd.: 2.8 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2017

Lott Brothers Construction Company, Ltd.'s TCR rose 0.7 from 2.8 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 107% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #246/327
  • PHOTO Simpson Construction…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Simpson Construction Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Lott Brothers Construction Company, Ltd. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lott Brothers Construction Company, Ltd. averages 3.1 TCR (107% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lott Brothers Construction Company, Ltd. TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=3.4 · BLS 2.9

Where Lott Brothers Construction Company, Ltd. falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #246 safest of 327 Commercial building constructi employers in Texas.

Lott Brothers Construction Company, Ltd. (33 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Lott Brothers Construction Company, Ltd.
Lott Brothers Construction Company, Ltd. (33 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Lott Brothers Construction Company, Ltd. has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · TX · Austin

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Simpson Construction Services 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farris Enterprises, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ventura 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE SW Seed Company New Deal 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Houston 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tejas Feeders LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrims LIVE OPERATIONS 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Legends - Northerly Island 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Global Services Supply Chain Operations : UX-Grove City, PA 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacksonville Center (Ncjac) 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR New York 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE HMA Contracting Corp. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCT - Plainfield 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCT - Dayton 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winston Weaver Fertilizer, Inc. 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.