Slicing machinery (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing · Minnesota

Lou-Rich Hayward

Hayward, MN · ~42 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lou-Rich Hayward runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Slicing machinery (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Lou-Rich Hayward: 2.9 TCR = 88% of Slicing machinery (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lou-Rich Hayward safety composite

Lou-Rich Hayward scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2017→2022

Lou-Rich Hayward injury rate improved

Lou-Rich Hayward's TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.3 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333241 · Hayward, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 88% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO BAADER Food Systems …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BAADER Food Systems USA, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Lou-Rich Hayward in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lou-Rich Hayward averages 2.9 TCR (88% of the Slicing machinery (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lou-Rich Hayward TCR series: 2017=2.3 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Lou-Rich Hayward falls in its industry

215 Slicing machinery (i.e., food establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Slicing machinery (i.e., food employers in Minnesota.

Lou-Rich Hayward (42 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lou-Rich Hayward
Lou-Rich Hayward (42 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Lou-Rich Hayward has fewer employees than the Slicing machinery (i.e., food manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.8 0.0 2 0 0
2020 4.9 0.0 2 0 0
2019 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333241 · MN · Hayward

215 Slicing machinery (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BAADER Food Systems USA, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greenline 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vanmark Equipment - Creston 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wenger Manufacturing, Inc. - 714 Main St. 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Michael Foods Inc.- GY2 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redwood Falls, MN-PS 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willmar Municipal Utilities 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benson Power, LLC 42 FTE
NAT-TCR 189 - Dickson City 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 374 - Levittown 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 952 - Orange City 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Guy W Shoup Inc 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Price Cutter # 86 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Price Cutter # 34 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE One Stop Environmental, LLC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Services of Sumter LLC 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.