Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing · Ohio

Lowry Tool & Die, Inc.

Salem, OH · ~25 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lowry Tool & Die, Inc. runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Lowry Tool & Die, Inc.: 5.2 TCR = 156% of Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lowry Tool & Die, Inc. safety composite

Lowry Tool & Die, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lowry Tool & Die, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Lowry Tool & Die, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 13.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=13.2 · 2023=13.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Salem, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 156% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #38/70
  • PHOTO NW4S, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NW4S, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Lowry Tool & Die, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lowry Tool & Die, Inc. averages 5.2 TCR (156% of the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lowry Tool & Die, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=13.2 · 2023=13.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Lowry Tool & Die, Inc. falls in its industry

477 Metal stampings (except automo establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 70 Metal stampings (except automo employers in Ohio.

Lowry Tool & Die, Inc. (25 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lowry Tool & Die, Inc.
Lowry Tool & Die, Inc. (25 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Lowry Tool & Die, Inc. has fewer employees than the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 13.8 4.6 3 0 0
2022 13.2 0.0 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 10.4 0.0 3 0 0
2018 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · OH · Salem

477 Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 70 employers in Salem, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NW4S, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Street 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Resource IL 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JMS of Holland, Inc 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rittman Orchards 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Convoy Dairy LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kalmbach Swine Management 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nature Pure Farm 2 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ventra Salem LLC 751 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fresh Mark Salem 729 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salem Community Hospital 689 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2910 364 FTE
NAT-TCR West Clinical 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kenyon Plastering of Fresno, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Office 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fourinox, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE US Tool Group - Palmdale O.C. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aero Trades Mfg. Corp. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Plastics & Machine 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hellman Construction Co., Inc. 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.