Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers · California

Lu Mar Industrial Metals Co., Ltd.

Compton, CA · ~38 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lu Mar Industrial Metals Co., Ltd. runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Lu Mar Industrial Metals Co., Ltd.: 2.6 TCR = 120% of Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lu Mar Industrial Metals Co., Ltd. safety composite

Lu Mar Industrial Metals Co., Ltd. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lu Mar Industrial Metals Co., Ltd.: 0.0 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Lu Mar Industrial Metals Co., Ltd.'s TCR rose 6.7 from 0.0 in 2018 to 6.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Compton, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 120% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #34/91
  • PHOTO Batliner Paper Stock…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Batliner Paper Stock Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Lu Mar Industrial Metals Co., Ltd. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lu Mar Industrial Metals Co., Ltd. averages 2.6 TCR (120% of the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lu Mar Industrial Metals Co., Ltd. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=6.7 · BLS 2.2

Where Lu Mar Industrial Metals Co., Ltd. falls in its industry

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automot establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 91 Scrap materials (e.g., automot employers in California.

Lu Mar Industrial Metals Co., Ltd. (38 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Lu Mar Industrial Metals Co., Ltd.
Lu Mar Industrial Metals Co., Ltd. (38 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Lu Mar Industrial Metals Co., Ltd. has fewer employees than the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, indus median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.7 0.0 2 0 0
2023 5.8 2.9 2 0 0
2022 0.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · CA · Compton

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 143 employers in Compton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Batliner Paper Stock Co. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR OmniSource LLC - Charlotte 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schupan Industrial Recycling Elkhart 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SM Group New Haven 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O SHIPPING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bays Ranch Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-017 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR 430-DC006 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR 430-DC001 789 FTE
CITY-NEAR The People Concern - SOLAR 448 FTE
NAT-TCR Evergreen Turf Office 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR EMM Electric, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR East Coast Steel Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Comfort Systems USA Northwest Inc 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Robert Hancock & Co. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Muska Plumbing 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE KW Corporation, INC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Converters, Inc. - Colorado 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.