Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge · Minnesota

Lunda/ C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture

Hopkins, MN · ~154 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lunda/ C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge workplace, earning a grade C.

Lunda/ C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture: 3.2 TCR = 114% of Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lunda/ C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture safety composite

Lunda/ C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lunda/ C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture: 2.7 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2024

Lunda/ C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture's TCR rose 0.8 from 2.7 in 2019 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Hopkins, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 114% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #44/107
  • PHOTO Grady Excavating, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grady Excavating, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Lunda/ C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lunda/ C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture averages 3.2 TCR (114% of the Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lunda/ C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture TCR series: 2019=2.7 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Lunda/ C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture falls in its industry

4,078 Construction management, highw establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 107 Construction management, highw employers in Minnesota.

Lunda/ C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture (154 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Lunda/ C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture
Lunda/ C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture (154 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Lunda/ C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture has more employees than the Construction management, highway, road, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 3.5 3 0 0
2023 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2022 3.6 2.4 9 0 0
2021 2.5 0.7 7 0 0
2020 5.4 3.0 17 1 0
2019 2.7 1.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · MN · Hopkins

4,078 Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 59 employers in Hopkins, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grady Excavating, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4 Contractor JV 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Paving Acquisitions, LTD. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division of Waste Water (CON-0225) 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shafer Contracting Co., Inc. 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pinnacle Wall Systems 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE NTE Engineering + Manufacturing 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sportech, Inc - Building One 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9320 Excelsior Crossings 1,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPERVALU DISTRIBUTION CENTER - MINNEAPOLIS 31511 902 FTE
CITY-NEAR Opportunity Partners - Koch Campus 897 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Blake School - Blake Campus 379 FTE
NAT-TCR Proof Research Inc 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Canyon Plastering & Drywall 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 0856 - Norfolk 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Grady Excavating, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Memphis Plant 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0642 - Delray Beach 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0732 - Cicero 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0871 - Peoria 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.