Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale · Minnesota

Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road

Eden Prairie, MN · ~170 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.4
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road runs at 350% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale workplace, earning a grade F.

Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road: 14.4 TCR = 350% of Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS 4.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road safety composite

Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road: 9.2 → 11.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 24.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.57× in 2022

Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road's TCR rose 2.0 from 9.2 in 2018 to 11.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 24.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311991 · Eden Prairie, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.4 · 350% of ind

  • DART 8.2 DART
  • RANK #9/9
  • PHOTO BRETT ANTHONY FOODS NB
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 118 inj
  • SIZE ~170 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BRETT ANTHONY FOODS NB (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road averages 14.4 TCR (350% of the Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road TCR series: 2018=9.2 · 2019=14.8 · 2020=11.9 · 2021=24.7 · 2022=11.2 · BLS 4.1

Where Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road falls in its industry

376 Food, prepared, perishable, pa establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 9 Food, prepared, perishable, pa employers in Minnesota.

Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road (170 employees, TCR 14.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road
Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road (170 employees, TCR 14.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road has fewer employees than the Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.2 8.2 22 0 0
2021 24.7 19.9 36 0 0
2020 11.9 10.3 22 0 0
2019 14.8 12.8 23 0 0
2018 9.2 8.6 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311991 · MN · Eden Prairie

376 Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 242 employers in Eden Prairie, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BRETT ANTHONY FOODS NB 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Classic Salads, LLC Watsonville 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountain King Spud Growers 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garden Cut 13.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brill Eagan 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highland Manufacturing 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE PLANT 9 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN101 1,940 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN051 1,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota 1,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fortra, LLC 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR I C Refrigeration Service, Inc 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Washington SNF Operator LLC 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Irwindale (Covina) 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Craig 14.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cullman 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE ARCH Medical Solutions 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE 253 - Franklin Park 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE UFP 170 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.