Holding companies that manage · Minnesota

Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi

Brooklyn Center, MN · ~74 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi runs at 573% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Holding companies that manage workplace, earning a grade F.

Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi: 4.0 TCR = 573% of Holding companies that manage BLS 0.7 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi safety composite

Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2017→2023

Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi injury rate improved

Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi's TCR fell 1.8 from 4.3 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.3 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Brooklyn Center, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.0 · 573% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #87/103
  • PHOTO 553272 360830_RAMSEY…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 553272 360830_RAMSEY WAIVER IN HOME_IDD HRLY PE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi averages 4.0 TCR (573% of the Holding companies that manage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi TCR series: 2017=4.3 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=5 · 2021=3 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=2.5 · BLS 0.7

Where Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi falls in its industry

1,475 Holding companies that manage establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 103 Holding companies that manage employers in Minnesota.

Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi (74 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi
Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi (74 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi has fewer employees than the Holding companies that manage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.5 1.3 2 0 0
2022 4.1 1.4 3 0 0
2021 3.0 0.0 2 0 0
2020 5.0 3.8 4 0 0
2019 5.3 3.9 4 0 0
2017 4.3 1.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · MN · Brooklyn Center

1,475 Holding companies that manage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 85 employers in Brooklyn Center, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 553272 360830_RAMSEY WAIVER IN HOME_IDD HRLY PE 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3899 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 529J - EAN Holdings, LLC South Texas Division 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Willet Hauser Company, LLC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE BT Shoreview 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wenzel Plymouth Plumbing 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro Home Insulation 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medtronic MECC 1,252 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medtronic MECC North 1,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brooklyn Center Ambulance 416 FTE
CITY-NEAR Topgolf Brooklyn Center 379 FTE
NAT-TCR Jamison Home Services, LLC 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DC 30 - Kutztown, PA 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR JPS Graphics Corporation 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Brook Park District 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hydro The Dalles Cast House 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Sanitary Supply 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Station Exchange Senior Care 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunray Plant 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.