General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Michigan

Luther Logistics Transportation LLC

Coopersville, MI · ~69 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Luther Logistics Transportation LLC runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade A.

Luther Logistics Transportation LLC: 1.4 TCR = 32% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Luther Logistics Transportation LLC safety composite

Luther Logistics Transportation LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2017→2024

Luther Logistics Transportation LLC injury rate improved

Luther Logistics Transportation LLC's TCR fell 2.9 from 2.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Coopersville, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/89
  • PHOTO Santa Fe Springs, CA…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Santa Fe Springs, CA Shoemaker (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Luther Logistics Transportation LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Luther Logistics Transportation LLC averages 1.4 TCR (32% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Luther Logistics Transportation LLC TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Luther Logistics Transportation LLC falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 89 General freight trucking, long employers in Michigan.

Luther Logistics Transportation LLC (69 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Luther Logistics Transportation LLC
Luther Logistics Transportation LLC (69 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Luther Logistics Transportation LLC has more employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · MI · Coopersville

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 24 employers in Coopersville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Santa Fe Springs, CA Shoemaker 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Front Royal, VA - Fairground 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Terminal 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR A. L. SMITH TRUCKING, INC. 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4605_10312 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (OH) 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works City of Wyoming 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE The LaSalle Group Inc 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairlife, LLC 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flextronics Automotive Manufacturing Inc 199 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental Dairy Facilities, LLC 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advantage Fleet 106 FTE
NAT-TCR Cue Health, Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Stell Enterprises, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR DMEA 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Princeton Upholstery Co., Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE SolEpoxy 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raley's 308-Modesto 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lash Construction Inc 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cascade Corporation 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.