District and regional offices · North Carolina

Lutheran Family Services - Raleigh Office

Raleigh, NC · ~32 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lutheran Family Services - Raleigh Office runs at 293% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical District and regional offices workplace, earning a grade F.

Lutheran Family Services - Raleigh Office: 2.0 TCR = 293% of District and regional offices BLS 0.7 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lutheran Family Services - Raleigh Office safety composite

Lutheran Family Services - Raleigh Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lutheran Family Services - Raleigh Office held a steady TCR band

Lutheran Family Services - Raleigh Office's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Raleigh, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.0 · 293% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #62/70
  • PHOTO NEW ERA OFFICE
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NEW ERA OFFICE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Lutheran Family Services - Raleigh Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lutheran Family Services - Raleigh Office averages 2.0 TCR (293% of the District and regional offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lutheran Family Services - Raleigh Office TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Lutheran Family Services - Raleigh Office falls in its industry

1,475 District and regional offices establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 70 District and regional offices employers in North Carolina.

Lutheran Family Services - Raleigh Office (32 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Lutheran Family Services - Raleigh Office
Lutheran Family Services - Raleigh Office (32 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Lutheran Family Services - Raleigh Office has fewer employees than the District and regional offices median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.1 0.0 1 1 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · NC · Raleigh

1,475 District and regional offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NEW ERA OFFICE 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA-Southern Region Office C 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Resthaven Corporate Office 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BEPCO, LP 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE T.C. Smith Produce Farm 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE LATHAMS NURSERY INC. - MONROE, NC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Wendell Farming Co. LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Goldsboro Hatchery 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Plant 12 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Quadrant EPP - Scranton 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chehalem Winery 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 2372 Shoppers-Stafford Market Place 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Inland Waste Solutions Augusta 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Limestone Transmission Substation 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Technologies 87 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dallas CPC 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.