Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Missouri

Lutheran Good Shepherd Home

Concordia, MO · ~58 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lutheran Good Shepherd Home runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Lutheran Good Shepherd Home: 9.5 TCR = 249% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lutheran Good Shepherd Home safety composite

Lutheran Good Shepherd Home scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lutheran Good Shepherd Home: 0.0 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 45.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.41× in 2022

Lutheran Good Shepherd Home's TCR rose 3.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 45.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Concordia, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 249% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #73/85
  • PHOTO White Oaks at McHenry
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: White Oaks at McHenry (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Lutheran Good Shepherd Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lutheran Good Shepherd Home averages 9.5 TCR (249% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lutheran Good Shepherd Home TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=9.6 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=45.5 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=3.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Lutheran Good Shepherd Home falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 85 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Missouri.

Lutheran Good Shepherd Home (58 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lutheran Good Shepherd Home
Lutheran Good Shepherd Home (58 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Lutheran Good Shepherd Home has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.9 3.9 4 0 0
2021 2.5 0.0 3 0 0
2020 45.5 37.2 1 10 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2017 9.6 4.8 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MO · Concordia

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 11 employers in Concordia, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR White Oaks at McHenry 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Willowbrook of Marshall 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tudor Gardens 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blossom Grove 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Doe Run Company Corporate Office 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rhodey Construction, Inc. 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acme Erectors, Inc. 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milbank Manufacturing - Concordia 261 FTE
CITY-NEAR Concordia Plant 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milbank Manufacturing Concordia 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lutheran Nursing Home 123 FTE
NAT-TCR CMBK Resort Holdings LLC 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #0744 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-01818 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-02908 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Parkview Care Center 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE JK Excavating & Utilities, Inc. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walker Building Group LLC 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calcon Constructors Inc 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.