Pump and Pumping Equipment Manufacturing · New York

Lutz-JESCO America Corp.

Rochester, NY · ~23 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lutz-JESCO America Corp. runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pump and Pumping Equipment Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Lutz-JESCO America Corp.: 4.4 TCR = 133% of Pump and Pumping Equipment Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lutz-JESCO America Corp. safety composite

Lutz-JESCO America Corp. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.3

2016→2024

Lutz-JESCO America Corp. injury rate improved

Lutz-JESCO America Corp.'s TCR fell 14.3 from 14.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=10.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333911 · Rochester, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 133% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Murray Equipment, Inc
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Murray Equipment, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Lutz-JESCO America Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lutz-JESCO America Corp. averages 4.4 TCR (133% of the Pump and Pumping Equipment Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lutz-JESCO America Corp. TCR series: 2016=14.3 · 2018=0 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=10.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Lutz-JESCO America Corp. falls in its industry

194 Pump and Pumping Equipment Man establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Pump and Pumping Equipment Man employers in New York.

Lutz-JESCO America Corp. (23 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Lutz-JESCO America Corp.
Lutz-JESCO America Corp. (23 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Lutz-JESCO America Corp. has fewer employees than the Pump and Pumping Equipment Manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 10.8 10.8 2 0 0
2020 5.6 5.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 14.3 14.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333911 · NY · Rochester

194 Pump and Pumping Equipment Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Murray Equipment, Inc 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardner Denver Petroleum Manufacturing Quincy 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CONCENTRIC ITASCA INC. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wolf Pump, Inc. 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Singer Farms LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sheland Farms LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE McKnight's River Breeze Farm, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stein Farms LLC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR Medical Center of the Rockies 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Keystone Charlotte #3130 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rock Hill Elementary School 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Mall of Monroe 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Leonard C. Carnaghi, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE TriGreen Equipment Athens 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rust-Oleum Corporation - Waupun 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ernst Concrete Columbus Plant 2 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.