Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made in integrated secondary smelting and wire drawing plants · Wisconsin

Luvata Appleton Kennedy Ave.

Kimberly, WI · ~25 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Luvata Appleton Kennedy Ave. runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made in integrated secondary smelting and wire drawing plants workplace, earning a grade D.

Luvata Appleton Kennedy Ave.: 6.3 TCR = 192% of Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made in integrated secondary smelting and wire drawing plants BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Luvata Appleton Kennedy Ave. safety composite

Luvata Appleton Kennedy Ave. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Luvata Appleton Kennedy Ave.: 0.0 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 15.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Luvata Appleton Kennedy Ave.'s TCR rose 4.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 15.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331420 · Kimberly, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 192% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P23
  • PHOTO Kalas Plant 2 - K2
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kalas Plant 2 - K2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Luvata Appleton Kennedy Ave. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Luvata Appleton Kennedy Ave. averages 6.3 TCR (192% of the Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made in integrated secondary smelting and wire drawing plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Luvata Appleton Kennedy Ave. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=5.2 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=15.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=12.2 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Luvata Appleton Kennedy Ave. falls in its industry

198 Wire, copper (e.g., armored, b establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Luvata Appleton Kennedy Ave. (25 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Luvata Appleton Kennedy Ave.
Luvata Appleton Kennedy Ave. (25 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Luvata Appleton Kennedy Ave. has fewer employees than the Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insul median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.1 0.0 0 1 0
2022 8.6 4.3 2 0 0
2021 12.2 12.2 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 15.4 10.3 3 0 0
2018 5.4 5.4 1 0 0
2017 5.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331420 · WI · Kimberly

198 Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made in integrated secondary smelting and wire drawing plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 20 employers in Kimberly, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kalas Plant 2 - K2 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avilla 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Therm-O-Link 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Copper Conductors LLC - Hoffman 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fergusons Minnesota Harvest LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minocqua Service Center 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Janesville Headquarters 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berlin Office 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crane Engineering 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR US AutoForce Kimberly 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR HSL 14, LLC 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Luvata Appleton Carter Ct. 80 FTE
NAT-TCR Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Work & Outdoor Group Division 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ind School District #203 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Rutland Material Recycling Facility 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Energy 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE 38 Cedar Springs 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nautical LLC DBA Holiday Inn Express 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Handbill Printers 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.