Cable, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made from purchased copper in wire drawing plants · Connecticut

Luvata Waterbury

Waterbury, CT · ~98 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Luvata Waterbury runs at 293% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cable, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made from purchased copper in wire drawing plants workplace, earning a grade F.

Luvata Waterbury: 9.7 TCR = 293% of Cable, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made from purchased copper in wire drawing plants BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Luvata Waterbury safety composite

Luvata Waterbury scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Luvata Waterbury held a steady TCR band

Luvata Waterbury's TCR held near 0.3 from 5.6 in 2017 to 5.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 17.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.6 · 2019=17.7 · 2021=11.3 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=10.2 · 2024=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331420 · Waterbury, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.7 · 293% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Bison Metals Technol…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bison Metals Technologies, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Luvata Waterbury in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Luvata Waterbury averages 9.7 TCR (293% of the Cable, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made from purchased copper in wire drawing plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Luvata Waterbury TCR series: 2017=5.6 · 2019=17.7 · 2021=11.3 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=10.2 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Luvata Waterbury falls in its industry

198 Cable, copper (e.g., armored, establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Cable, copper (e.g., armored, employers in Connecticut.

Luvata Waterbury (98 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Luvata Waterbury
Luvata Waterbury (98 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Luvata Waterbury has fewer employees than the Cable, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 5.3 11 0 0
2023 10.2 8.2 10 0 0
2022 7.5 6.4 7 0 0
2021 11.3 8.5 12 0 0
2019 17.7 15.5 14 2 0
2017 5.6 5.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331420 · CT · Waterbury

198 Cable, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made from purchased copper in wire drawing plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 218 employers in Waterbury, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bison Metals Technologies, LLC 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Luvata Appleton Carter Ct. 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Luvata Appleton Lawe St. 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royal Metal Powders 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eversource - East Hampton 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bridgeport WWTP 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE CJ Fucci Construction 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berlin Steel - CT Office 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Mary's Hospital 1,654 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waterbury Hospital 1,472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hartford-Saint Mary's Hospital 1,292 FTE
CITY-NEAR Naugatuck Valley Community College 1,277 FTE
NAT-TCR Alton Memorial Hosp 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bright Living Roanoke, LLC 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR McClellandtown Hauling 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Skyline Construction Services Inc 9.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Telemedia Trainco Holdings LLC 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 145 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 155 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Texas Drum Company 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.