Sodium inorganic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing · New Jersey

Luxfer MEL Technologies

Flemington, NJ · ~45 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Luxfer MEL Technologies runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sodium inorganic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Luxfer MEL Technologies: 4.5 TCR = 136% of Sodium inorganic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Luxfer MEL Technologies safety composite

Luxfer MEL Technologies scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2017→2020

Luxfer MEL Technologies injury rate improved

Luxfer MEL Technologies's TCR fell 7.7 from 7.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.7 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325180 · Flemington, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 136% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/11
  • PHOTO Chemical Products Co…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chemical Products Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Luxfer MEL Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Luxfer MEL Technologies averages 4.5 TCR (136% of the Sodium inorganic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Luxfer MEL Technologies TCR series: 2017=7.7 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Luxfer MEL Technologies falls in its industry

418 Sodium inorganic compounds, no establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 11 Sodium inorganic compounds, no employers in New Jersey.

Luxfer MEL Technologies (45 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Luxfer MEL Technologies
Luxfer MEL Technologies (45 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Luxfer MEL Technologies has fewer employees than the Sodium inorganic compounds, not specifie median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.5 4.3 3 0 0
2018 3.8 1.9 2 0 0
2017 7.7 2.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325180 · NJ · Flemington

418 Sodium inorganic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 51 employers in Flemington, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chemical Products Corporation 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Timilon Corporation Topeka Facility 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pencco, Inc. - Bardwell 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LANXESS Corporation - Oxone 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE South Jersey Gas-Cumberland 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Jersey Gas: Atlantic Division 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redcom Design and Construction LLC 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR ShopRite of Flemington 375 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2294 273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flemington 229 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2294 229 FTE
NAT-TCR Courtyard by Marriott Anaheim Resort Convention Center 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Seaway Mfg 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR American Excelsior Corporate Office 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Prism Hospitality, LP - Hilton Tucson - El Conquistador 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harpeth Towing and Recovery Inc 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carpenter Liquid Transporters, Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE JMS Transport, LLC - El Dorado, AR 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rms Supply 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.