Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction · Texas

Lyondell Basell CVO N

Channelview, TX · ~204 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lyondell Basell CVO N runs at 4% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Lyondell Basell CVO N: 0.1 TCR = 4% of Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lyondell Basell CVO N safety composite

Lyondell Basell CVO N scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lyondell Basell CVO N held a steady TCR band

Lyondell Basell CVO N's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Channelview, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 4% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/114
  • PHOTO PCE Constructors, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~204 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PCE Constructors, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Lyondell Basell CVO N in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lyondell Basell CVO N averages 0.1 TCR (4% of the Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lyondell Basell CVO N TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Lyondell Basell CVO N falls in its industry

932 Other Heavy and Civil Engineer establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 114 Other Heavy and Civil Engineer employers in Texas.

Lyondell Basell CVO N (204 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lyondell Basell CVO N
Lyondell Basell CVO N (204 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Lyondell Basell CVO N has more employees than the Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Constr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · TX · Channelview

932 Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 62 employers in Channelview, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PCE Constructors, Inc. 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shell Chemical LP Deer Park TX 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TIM at CF Industries Donaldsonville LA 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tellepsen Industrial 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bluewater Constructors, Inc. 204 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oak Hill Parkway Project 204 FTE
STATE-SIZE SACC 204 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mesa Mechanical, Inc. 204 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8921 Lyondell Channelview PG 1,056 FTE
CITY-NEAR NorthStar Energy Services, Inc. 791 FTE
CITY-NEAR Equistar Chemicals, LP 661 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lyondell Chemical Company 528 FTE
NAT-TCR Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (Windsor Locks CT) 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Insight Global 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Arinc Incoporated (Annapolis MD) 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Structsure Scaffold Solutions LLC 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE MEKRA Lang North America LLC 204 FTE
NAT-SIZE Office building 204 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mankato MN (Plant) 204 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodman's Food Market Onalaska 24 204 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.