Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · California

M and S Enterprise LLC

Torrance, CA · ~84 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M and S Enterprise LLC runs at 486% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade F.

M and S Enterprise LLC: 21.9 TCR = 486% of Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M and S Enterprise LLC safety composite

M and S Enterprise LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.5

2022→2024

M and S Enterprise LLC injury rate improved

M and S Enterprise LLC's TCR fell 9.5 from 27.2 in 2022 to 17.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 27.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=27.2 · 2023=20.6 · 2024=17.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Torrance, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.9 · 486% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #130/168
  • PHOTO 6458-ZPEO
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6458-ZPEO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

M and S Enterprise LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows M and S Enterprise LLC averages 21.9 TCR (486% of the Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

M and S Enterprise LLC TCR series: 2022=27.2 · 2023=20.6 · 2024=17.8 · BLS 4.5

Where M and S Enterprise LLC falls in its industry

1,452 Delivery service (except as pa establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #130 safest of 168 Delivery service (except as pa employers in California.

M and S Enterprise LLC (84 employees, TCR 21.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate M and S Enterprise LLC
M and S Enterprise LLC (84 employees, TCR 21.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

M and S Enterprise LLC has fewer employees than the Delivery service (except as part of inte median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17.8 0.0 14 0 0
2023 20.6 15.1 15 0 0
2022 27.2 22.4 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · CA · Torrance

1,452 Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 332 employers in Torrance, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZPEO 21.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baystate Delivery Inc 21.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Freedom Logistics Inc. 21.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZNCA 21.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE montalvo farms 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hansen Custom Farming, LLC 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hilarides Dairy 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE McIntyre Labor Service, LLC. 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harbor-UCLA Medical Center 4,144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Torrance Memorial Medical Center 3,808 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 494 2,621 FTE
NAT-TCR CK DIST-Omaha 21.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Western Home Services 21.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0096 Oro Valley 21.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ace Auto Parts & Salvage Co Inc 21.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arrived Logistics LLC 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sheraton Hartford Hotel at Bradley Airport 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dreisilker Electric Motors, Inc. 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE DMF5 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.