Motor vehicle garage and service station mechanical equipment (e.g., gasoline pumps, hoists) installation · Hawaii

M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd.

Honolulu, HI · ~26 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd. runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Motor vehicle garage and service station mechanical equipment (e.g., gasoline pumps, hoists) installation workplace, earning a grade D.

M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd.: 3.9 TCR = 138% of Motor vehicle garage and service station mechanical equipment (e.g., gasoline pumps, hoists) installation BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd. safety composite

M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd.: 0.0 → 7.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 7.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2017

M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd.'s TCR rose 7.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 7.7 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Honolulu, HI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.9 · 138% of ind

  • DART 7.7 DART
  • RANK #6/9
  • PHOTO Overhead Door Compan…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Overhead Door Company of St. Louis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Hawaii employers → · Look up another →

M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd. averages 3.9 TCR (138% of the Motor vehicle garage and service station mechanical equipment (e.g., gasoline pumps, hoists) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=7.7 · BLS 2.8

Where M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd. falls in its industry

1,138 Motor vehicle garage and servi establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Hawaii alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 9 Motor vehicle garage and servi employers in Hawaii.

M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd. (26 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd.
M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd. (26 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd. has fewer employees than the Motor vehicle garage and service station median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 7.7 7.7 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · HI · Honolulu

1,138 Motor vehicle garage and service station mechanical equipment (e.g., gasoline pumps, hoists) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,022 rated employers in Hawaii with headcount on file · 796 employers in Honolulu, HI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Overhead Door Company of St. Louis 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Industrial Door LLC 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anchor Insulation- RI Industrial/Mechanical- IBP Branch 302/303 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DH Pace Door Services - Omaha 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pu'uloa Farms, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE 105146 - HDOT - Runway 8L 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paul's Electrical Service 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE PAC Electric 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9095-HNL 5,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR HNL HONOLULUL 4,589 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawaiian Airlines - HNL 4,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12812007 MOANALUA MEDICAL OFFICES 2,355 FTE
NAT-TCR Bellefontaine Gardens Nursing and Rehab Inc 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Economy Spring 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR US - Supply Chain : 0946 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pink Jeep Tours Las Vegas 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0765 - Roseburg, or 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0391 - Avondale, Az 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0215 - Philadelphia, Pa 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0213 - Jacksonville West, Fl 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.