Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Arizona

M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC

Gilbert, AZ · ~124 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade A.

M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC: 1.2 TCR = 42% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC safety composite

M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC held a steady TCR band

M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC's TCR held near 0.2 from 1.2 in 2018 to 1.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.2 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Gilbert, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 42% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #11/63
  • PHOTO 2302 - Sparks, NV
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2302 - Sparks, NV (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC averages 1.2 TCR (42% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC TCR series: 2018=1.2 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 2.8

Where M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 63 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Arizona.

M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC (124 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC
M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC (124 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC has more employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2023 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.2 1.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · AZ · Gilbert

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 261 employers in Gilbert, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2302 - Sparks, NV 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teichert Construction Fresno 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allied Contractors, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR iSX Construction, LLC 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Construction 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE USI Mesa 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schreiber Foods Inc. 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oldcastle OPI - Chandler 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030512 1,613 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Gilbert 1,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030512-512001 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-512 911 FTE
NAT-TCR ColdSnap, Corp. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Alpha Leominster 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Vuzix Corporation 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Park Elementary 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coral Springs Marriott 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horton Inc 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-NAES Boston 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan NE 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.