Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge · Connecticut

M & S Paving and Sealing, Inc.

South Windsor, CT · ~23 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M & S Paving and Sealing, Inc. runs at 272% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge workplace, earning a grade F.

M & S Paving and Sealing, Inc.: 7.6 TCR = 272% of Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M & S Paving and Sealing, Inc. safety composite

M & S Paving and Sealing, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2020→2023

M & S Paving and Sealing, Inc. injury rate improved

M & S Paving and Sealing, Inc.'s TCR fell 6.3 from 6.3 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 18.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=6.3 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=18.3 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · South Windsor, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 272% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/71
  • PHOTO Monarch Oil Company
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Monarch Oil Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

M & S Paving and Sealing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows M & S Paving and Sealing, Inc. averages 7.6 TCR (272% of the Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

M & S Paving and Sealing, Inc. TCR series: 2020=6.3 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=18.3 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where M & S Paving and Sealing, Inc. falls in its industry

4,078 Construction management, highw establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 71 Construction management, highw employers in Connecticut.

M & S Paving and Sealing, Inc. (23 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate M & S Paving and Sealing, Inc.
M & S Paving and Sealing, Inc. (23 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

M & S Paving and Sealing, Inc. has fewer employees than the Construction management, highway, road, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 18.3 18.3 2 1 0
2021 5.8 5.8 1 0 0
2020 6.3 6.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · CT · South Windsor

4,078 Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 117 employers in South Windsor, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Monarch Oil Company 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keleman-Bauer Construction Inc. DBA Edbauer Construction 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northwest Asphalt, Inc. 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Seal Company 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE InnoConn Construction Management LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE OWI Contractors, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrew Ansaldi Company 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cocchiola Paving Inc 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1223 Swn1000 630 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZSWN 579 FTE
CITY-NEAR Broadridge Customer Communications, LLC 571 FTE
CITY-NEAR New England Mechanical Services, Inc. 413 FTE
NAT-TCR County of Harnett-Economic Development-General Services-Facilities-Fleet 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Txcan - Houston (Canino) Hub 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheriff's Office-SAR 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SSC-MA 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jim Mansell Trucking, Inc 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ironwood Homes, inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apex Logistics International Inc. SFO 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1157 Design Concepts LLC 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.