Filters, electronic component-type, manufacturing · Texas

M2 Global Technology, Ltd.

San Antonio, TX · ~49 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M2 Global Technology, Ltd. runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Filters, electronic component-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

M2 Global Technology, Ltd.: 0.3 TCR = 11% of Filters, electronic component-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M2 Global Technology, Ltd. safety composite

M2 Global Technology, Ltd. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2019→2023

M2 Global Technology, Ltd. injury rate improved

M2 Global Technology, Ltd.'s TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334419 · San Antonio, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/9
  • PHOTO American Cable and E…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American Cable and Electronics, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

M2 Global Technology, Ltd. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows M2 Global Technology, Ltd. averages 0.3 TCR (11% of the Filters, electronic component-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

M2 Global Technology, Ltd. TCR series: 2019=1.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where M2 Global Technology, Ltd. falls in its industry

334 Filters, electronic component- establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 9 Filters, electronic component- employers in Texas.

M2 Global Technology, Ltd. (49 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate M2 Global Technology, Ltd.
M2 Global Technology, Ltd. (49 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8

M2 Global Technology, Ltd. has fewer employees than the Filters, electronic component-type, manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334419 · TX · San Antonio

334 Filters, electronic component-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American Cable and Electronics, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morgan Advanced Materials Bedford 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bourns, Inc. - Riverside, CA 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR JADAK 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE WOLF CREEK FEED YARD 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Friona Feedyard 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spandet Dairy Friona 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vist Grande Dairy 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Mi - Basf (40) 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hollister Incorporated Libertyville 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Food Merchandising : MINERAL WELLS 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Adisseo USA Inc 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Orlando DC 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Herzog Railroad Services, Inc. - MPM/ClipCar 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Centerlight Healthcare Grand St 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peregrine Senior Living at Crimson Ridge Gardens 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.