Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · California

MA1 Logistics, Inc.

La Mesa, CA · ~32 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
26.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MA1 Logistics, Inc. runs at 410% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

MA1 Logistics, Inc.: 26.6 TCR = 410% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MA1 Logistics, Inc. safety composite

MA1 Logistics, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 26.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 28.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

MA1 Logistics, Inc.: 15.2 → 38.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 38.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2023

MA1 Logistics, Inc.'s TCR rose 23.0 from 15.2 in 2022 to 38.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · La Mesa, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 26.6 · 410% of ind

  • DART 28.6 DART
  • RANK #697/710
  • PHOTO Top Priority Cargo Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Top Priority Cargo Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

MA1 Logistics, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MA1 Logistics, Inc. averages 26.6 TCR (410% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MA1 Logistics, Inc. TCR series: 2022=15.2 · 2023=38.1 · BLS 6.5

Where MA1 Logistics, Inc. falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #697 safest of 710 Express delivery services (exc employers in California.

MA1 Logistics, Inc. (32 employees, TCR 26.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate MA1 Logistics, Inc.
MA1 Logistics, Inc. (32 employees, TCR 26.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

MA1 Logistics, Inc. has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 38.1 28.6 8 0 0
2022 15.2 15.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CA · La Mesa

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 85 employers in La Mesa, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Top Priority Cargo Inc 26.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 953 26.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ocean State Logistics, LLC 26.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sans Peur Delivery 26.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Farms 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIVE POINTS T.I.C. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE OFFICE 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brocchini Farms Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grossmont Hospital - 5555 Grossmont Center Drive 3,453 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grossmont Hospital 3,275 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0469 - LA MESA CA WHSE 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of La Mesa 345 FTE
NAT-TCR Top Priority Cargo Inc 26.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilson Care, LLC 26.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Town East Mall 26.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Schnepp Senior Care and Rehab Center 26.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE PA North Brunswick 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commerce Ga 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Residential HVAC and Supply : East Region : NC - Charlotte USA 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Greater Northeast : SVC-Providence RI-USA 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.