General medical and surgical hospitals · Connecticut

MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institute

Suffield, CT · ~87 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institute runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade C.

MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institute: 8.2 TCR = 109% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institute safety composite

MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institute scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2017

MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institute injury rate improved

MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institute's TCR fell 3.2 from 9.8 in 2016 to 6.6 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.8 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.8 · 2017=6.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Suffield, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 8.2 · 109% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #66/86
  • PHOTO AdventHealth Shawnee…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AdventHealth Shawnee Mission (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institute in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institute averages 8.2 TCR (109% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institute TCR series: 2016=9.8 · 2017=6.6 · BLS 7.5

Where MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institute falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 86 General medical and surgical h employers in Connecticut.

MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institute (87 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institute
MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institute (87 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institute has fewer employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 6.6 6.6 4 1 0
2016 9.8 8.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · CT · Suffield

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 24 employers in Suffield, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AdventHealth Shawnee Mission 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hartford-Saint Mary's Hospital 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FCHN - Franklin Memorial Hospital 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR River Falls Area Hospital 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Region 206 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kanthal Bethel 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE CoorsTek, Inc. 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Senior Aerospace Connecticut 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution 645 FTE
CITY-NEAR Suffield Manor Incorporated 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR CS Wholesale Grocers : Suffield, CT (GDC) 203 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kongsberg Automotive 179 FTE
NAT-TCR Windkits, LLC 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Circleville Center 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta Hub (Gaatl) 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Polar Service Centers - Rockdale 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Poplar Bluff Inc 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fleetline dba Dart Transit Lancaster 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE 44541G - High Point/Greensboro DC 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kimber Mfg., Inc. 1 Lawton 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.