General warehousing and storage · Missouri

Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Macon, MO · ~22 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade D.

Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co.: 8.3 TCR = 142% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. safety composite

Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. held a steady TCR band

Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co.'s TCR held near 0.3 from 5.1 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.1 · 2017=5.0 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=10.0 · 2021=14.9 · 2022=10.2 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Macon, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.3 · 142% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #156/179
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - FOE1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. averages 8.3 TCR (142% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=5 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=10 · 2021=14.9 · 2022=10.2 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 5.8

Where Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #156 safest of 179 General warehousing and storag employers in Missouri.

Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (22 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (22 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2023 9.7 9.7 2 0 0
2022 10.2 10.2 2 0 0
2021 14.9 5.0 3 0 0
2020 10.0 10.0 2 0 0
2019 9.7 9.7 2 0 0
2018 4.9 4.9 1 0 0
2017 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2016 5.1 5.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MO · Macon

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 21 employers in Macon, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - FOE1 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alexander Valley Cellars, INC 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5865 STONECREST FDCBDC 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon Transportation Services : PDX5 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Turkey Hill Farms, LLC. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAYTAN FARROWING 47117 -EST 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE TERRE HAUTE SOW #6 & #2 -EST 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chariton Pork 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Macon, MO 359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Loch Haven Senior Living Community 240 FTE
CITY-NEAR LOCH HAVEN NURSING HOME 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 783 109 FTE
NAT-TCR Mid-State Paving, LLC 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1570 Lkq 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR DOT 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Duke Raleigh Hospital 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Royal Winery 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Graphicast 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store #14 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Twinsburg Location 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.