Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Maryland

MAD Fort Mead

Fort Meade, MD · ~111 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MAD Fort Mead runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

MAD Fort Mead: 0.9 TCR = 31% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MAD Fort Mead safety composite

MAD Fort Mead scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

MAD Fort Mead held a steady TCR band

MAD Fort Mead's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.9 in 2021 to 0.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.9 · 2022=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Fort Meade, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #16/121
  • PHOTO Systems Plant Servic…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Systems Plant Services, Inc.-BRS-ARK18 Osceola, AR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

MAD Fort Mead in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MAD Fort Mead averages 0.9 TCR (31% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MAD Fort Mead TCR series: 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.8 · BLS 2.8

Where MAD Fort Mead falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 121 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Maryland.

MAD Fort Mead (111 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate MAD Fort Mead
MAD Fort Mead (111 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

MAD Fort Mead has more employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2021 0.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MD · Fort Meade

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 9 employers in Fort Meade, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Systems Plant Services, Inc.-BRS-ARK18 Osceola, AR 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rich Plumbing, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bob Bernhard & Associates Mechanical 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carrier Commercial Services (Indianapolis) 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Empire Landscape, LLC 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hanover Maryland 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kent Island Mechanical, Inc 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brock Services MidAtlantic Area 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Public Health Command - Atlantic 230 FTE
CITY-NEAR Empty Pockets US MD Fort Meade MD MD978 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Meade MD 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Meade 42 FTE
NAT-TCR Modine Manufacturing Company - Grenada LAL 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1175 Woodbury 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sandy Springs PDO 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist Univ-Dining 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4765-RNOCX0755 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4765-LASPW9622 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Breakthru Beverage Group Nevada Reno, LLC. 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Tucson 39320 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.