Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) · Connecticut

Madison Hose Co. #1

Madison, CT · ~33 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Madison Hose Co. #1 runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) workplace, earning a grade C.

Madison Hose Co. #1: 2.8 TCR = 87% of Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Madison Hose Co. #1 safety composite

Madison Hose Co. #1 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Madison Hose Co. #1 held a steady TCR band

Madison Hose Co. #1's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=13.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Madison, CT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 87% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/113
  • PHOTO Kingman Fire Departm…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kingman Fire Department Station 23 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Madison Hose Co. #1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Madison Hose Co. #1 averages 2.8 TCR (87% of the Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Madison Hose Co. #1 TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=13.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Madison Hose Co. #1 falls in its industry

793 Fire departments (e.g., govern establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 113 Fire departments (e.g., govern employers in Connecticut.

Madison Hose Co. #1 (33 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Madison Hose Co. #1
Madison Hose Co. #1 (33 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

Madison Hose Co. #1 has fewer employees than the Fire departments (e.g., government, volu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 13.9 4.6 1 2 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · CT · Madison

793 Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 27 employers in Madison, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kingman Fire Department Station 23 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Communications 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Station 94 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Clive Fire Department 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greater New Haven WPCA 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greater New Haven Water Pollution Control Authority - Administrative Bldg. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Nutmeg Companies, Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaFramboise Well Drilling, Inc. 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR 100624 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR STOP & SHOP 100624 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vista Life Innovations - Madison Campus 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Madison Beach Hotel 116 FTE
NAT-TCR Sunbeam Products, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lord & Company Technologies, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Jagoe-Public Company 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Power Plus, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Freight Lines - Waco 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE DSM Nutritional Products - Ames 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE KG Marketing & Bag Co. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 1002 Stampede Meats - Santa Teresa 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.