Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Alabama

Madison Manor Nursing Home

Madison, AL · ~82 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Madison Manor Nursing Home runs at 199% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade D.

Madison Manor Nursing Home: 12.9 TCR = 199% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Madison Manor Nursing Home safety composite

Madison Manor Nursing Home scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Madison Manor Nursing Home: 2.8 → 10.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 39.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.2× in 2024

Madison Manor Nursing Home's TCR rose 7.8 from 2.8 in 2016 to 10.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 39.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Madison, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 12.9 · 199% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #217/269
  • PHOTO MediLodge of Leelanau
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MediLodge of Leelanau (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Madison Manor Nursing Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Madison Manor Nursing Home averages 12.9 TCR (199% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Madison Manor Nursing Home TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=24.8 · 2021=39.9 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=13.3 · 2024=10.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Madison Manor Nursing Home falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #217 safest of 269 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Alabama.

Madison Manor Nursing Home (82 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Madison Manor Nursing Home
Madison Manor Nursing Home (82 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Madison Manor Nursing Home has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.6 2.6 8 0 0
2023 13.3 8.9 9 0 0
2022 8.8 1.5 6 0 0
2021 39.9 39.9 2 25 0
2020 24.8 21.9 4 13 0
2019 4.5 4.5 3 0 0
2018 5.9 5.9 4 0 0
2017 5.8 5.8 4 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · AL · Madison

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 131 employers in Madison, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MediLodge of Leelanau 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Odd Fellow- Rebekah Home 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Marietta 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meadowbrook Manor - Bolingbrook 12.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Henagar Hatchery 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE C-Sharpe Company 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE HP2 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baron Weather, Inc. 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mazda Toyota Manufacturing USA Inc 4,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mazda Toyota Manufacturing, U.S.A., Inc. 1,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR Polaris Industries 1,604 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0580 - Huntsville DC 1,312 FTE
NAT-TCR Book Fairs - Baton Rouge 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Five Crowns 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR A-G Sod Farms of Fresno 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MediLodge of Leelanau 12.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE EcoElectrica, LP 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highland Park Care Center 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE VOORHEES 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kiski 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.