Automotive mirrors, framed, manufacturing · Michigan

Magna Engineered Glass

Holland, MI · ~855 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Magna Engineered Glass runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Automotive mirrors, framed, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Magna Engineered Glass: 5.6 TCR = 104% of Automotive mirrors, framed, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Magna Engineered Glass safety composite

Magna Engineered Glass scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2016→2023

Magna Engineered Glass injury rate improved

Magna Engineered Glass's TCR fell 5.4 from 8.3 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.3 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=8.6 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Holland, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.6 · 104% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #128/146
  • PHOTO Yachiyo Manufacturin…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 278 inj
  • SIZE ~855 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Yachiyo Manufacturing of America, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Magna Engineered Glass in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Magna Engineered Glass averages 5.6 TCR (104% of the Automotive mirrors, framed, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Magna Engineered Glass TCR series: 2016=8.3 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=8.6 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.8 · BLS 5.4

Where Magna Engineered Glass falls in its industry

772 Automotive mirrors, framed, ma establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #128 safest of 146 Automotive mirrors, framed, ma employers in Michigan.

Magna Engineered Glass (855 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Magna Engineered Glass
Magna Engineered Glass (855 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Magna Engineered Glass has more employees than the Automotive mirrors, framed, manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.8 2.4 20 0 0
2022 2.8 2.0 19 0 0
2021 6.8 5.1 41 4 0
2018 8.6 4.3 89 2 0
2017 4.5 2.8 44 3 0
2016 8.3 2.9 65 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · MI · Holland

772 Automotive mirrors, framed, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 299 employers in Holland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Yachiyo Manufacturing of America, LLC 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pro-Fabrication, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FICOSA NORTH AMERICA SHELBYVILLE 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Illinois Manufacturing Co, Cim-Tek Filtration 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE MidMichigan Medical Center - Alpena 857 FTE
STATE-SIZE Little Ceasars Arena 853 FTE
STATE-SIZE AUTO TRANSM NEW PRODUCT CTR 858 FTE
STATE-SIZE FORWARD CORPORATION 859 FTE
CITY-NEAR LG Energy Solutions - Holland 1,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haworth HQ 1,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haworth Office 1,075 FTE
CITY-NEAR PADNOS 912 FTE
NAT-TCR Area Erectors - Chicago 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Comal Health Care Center Ltd. Co. d/b/a Sundance Inn Health Center 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Price Rite of Paterson 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4576 Machesney Park, IL 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rite Aid Distribution 855 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sysmex America, Inc. 855 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Bay Regional Park District 855 FTE
NAT-SIZE PHX - Ground Ops 855 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.