Skilled nursing facilities · California

Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital

Granada Hills, CA · ~151 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital: 10.3 TCR = 159% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital safety composite

Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2018→2024

Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital injury rate improved

Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital's TCR fell 6.3 from 7.6 in 2018 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 54.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.6 · 2020=54.1 · 2023=22.0 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Granada Hills, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 10.3 · 159% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #506/739
  • PHOTO Cumberland Pointe He…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~151 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cumberland Pointe Health Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital averages 10.3 TCR (159% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital TCR series: 2018=7.6 · 2020=54.1 · 2023=22 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #506 safest of 739 Skilled nursing facilities employers in California.

Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital (151 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital
Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital (151 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.1 10 5 0
2023 22.0 13.2 15 10 0
2020 54.1 51.9 9 42 1
2018 7.6 7.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Granada Hills

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 34 employers in Granada Hills, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cumberland Pointe Health Campus 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Country Villa Terrace Assisted Living Center 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kingsbrook Lifecare Center 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunnyview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Delta Farm Packing 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Truitt Oilfield Maintenance Corp. 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chino Base - Bld: 0842 - 15 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lodi Pump and Irrigation, LLC 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 457 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Granada Hills Charter 540 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2329 - Granada Hills 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR MWL Solutions Inc 158 FTE
NAT-TCR VAR004 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1162 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kingsbrook Lifecare Center 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunnyview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sara Warehouse 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Young & Sons Drywall 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Poppelmann Plastics USA LLC 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plato Woodwork Inc 151 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.