Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Tennessee

Magnolia Place Assisted Living

Waverly, TN · ~35 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Magnolia Place Assisted Living runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Magnolia Place Assisted Living: 2.5 TCR = 65% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Magnolia Place Assisted Living safety composite

Magnolia Place Assisted Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.4

2017→2024

Magnolia Place Assisted Living injury rate improved

Magnolia Place Assisted Living's TCR fell 10.4 from 10.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Waverly, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/100
  • PHOTO Edgewood Pierre
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Edgewood Pierre (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Magnolia Place Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Magnolia Place Assisted Living averages 2.5 TCR (65% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Magnolia Place Assisted Living TCR series: 2017=10.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Magnolia Place Assisted Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 100 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Tennessee.

Magnolia Place Assisted Living (35 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Magnolia Place Assisted Living
Magnolia Place Assisted Living (35 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Magnolia Place Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2021 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2020 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 10.4 5.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TN · Waverly

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 31 employers in Waverly, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Pierre 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cogir of San Rafael 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakeside Place Senior Living 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Five Star Premier Residences of Plantation 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE TN 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE 810 CRESCENT CENTRE DR FRANKLIN TN 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE 200 NOAH DR FRANKLIN TN 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Distribution and Business Office 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 390 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hood Container Corporation 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hood Container New Johnsonville 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR 390 186 FTE
NAT-TCR Oldenburg Metal Tech 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MPP - Campbellsburg 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wieser Concrete Products Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Williams Foods 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE High Liner Foods - Peabody 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dalton's Place at Waldron 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE NTX - Lewisville 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE White Star Machinery - Tulsa 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.