Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Ohio

Magnolia Springs Loveland

Loveland, OH · ~68 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Magnolia Springs Loveland runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Magnolia Springs Loveland: 2.8 TCR = 72% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Magnolia Springs Loveland safety composite

Magnolia Springs Loveland scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Magnolia Springs Loveland: 0.0 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Magnolia Springs Loveland's TCR rose 4.8 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Loveland, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #52/243
  • PHOTO CELEBRATION VILLA OF…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CELEBRATION VILLA OF MARTINSBURG (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Magnolia Springs Loveland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Magnolia Springs Loveland averages 2.8 TCR (72% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Magnolia Springs Loveland TCR series: 2017=0 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=4.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Magnolia Springs Loveland falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 243 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

Magnolia Springs Loveland (68 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Magnolia Springs Loveland
Magnolia Springs Loveland (68 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Magnolia Springs Loveland has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.8 0.0 3 0 0
2020 6.1 6.1 4 0 0
2019 0.1 0.1 3 3 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OH · Loveland

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 50 employers in Loveland, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CELEBRATION VILLA OF MARTINSBURG 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SKY ACTIVE VENETIAN GARDENS 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR EMS - Sanctuary St. Cloud 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10782 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE FarmaceuticalRX LLC OH 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maria Gardens 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Layer 1 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Layer 4 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Field Sales Central 393 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMS Construction Inc 252 FTE
CITY-NEAR 014-00435 221 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer Store 150 205 FTE
NAT-TCR Kohler Industries, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hla Jessup, Pa 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Watertown Ramkota 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wesley Willows 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brevard 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kazar's Electric, Inc. 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Curtin Dairy 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCS Red Hills 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.