HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors · Oregon

Mahalo Heating and Air Conditioning

Roseburg, OR · ~24 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mahalo Heating and Air Conditioning runs at 665% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Mahalo Heating and Air Conditioning: 18.6 TCR = 665% of HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mahalo Heating and Air Conditioning safety composite

Mahalo Heating and Air Conditioning scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−19.0

2021→2022

Mahalo Heating and Air Conditioning injury rate improved

Mahalo Heating and Air Conditioning's TCR fell 19.0 from 28.1 in 2021 to 9.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 28.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=28.1 · 2022=9.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Roseburg, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.6 · 665% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #84/86
  • PHOTO Tyler Sheet Metal, I…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tyler Sheet Metal, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Mahalo Heating and Air Conditioning in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mahalo Heating and Air Conditioning averages 18.6 TCR (665% of the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mahalo Heating and Air Conditioning TCR series: 2021=28.1 · 2022=9.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Mahalo Heating and Air Conditioning falls in its industry

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #84 safest of 86 HVAC (heating, ventilation and employers in Oregon.

Mahalo Heating and Air Conditioning (24 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mahalo Heating and Air Conditioning
Mahalo Heating and Air Conditioning (24 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Mahalo Heating and Air Conditioning has fewer employees than the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-condi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 9.1 4.5 2 0 0
2021 28.1 9.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · OR · Roseburg

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 125 employers in Roseburg, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tyler Sheet Metal, Inc. 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Comfort, Inc. 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Focus Plumbing, LLC - Sparks 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Everest Mechanical LLC 18.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Froerer Farms inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilson Cattle Company 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bonanza View Dairy 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Century Ranch, LLC 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Outpatient Lab 5,503 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foundation, Community Education, Healthy Kids 1,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine Lab - Mercy Laboratory 1,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine - Mercy Imaging 1,022 FTE
NAT-TCR 479511-MEM-FRAYSER 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Roosevelt Elementary 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Village of Northbrook - Public Works 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lasc Admin 18.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arvana Gin 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4192-00051423-IDA 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Killeen HS #6 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE RRS Fostoria 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.