Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Tennessee

Main Office

Piperton, TN · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Main Office runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Main Office: 2.5 TCR = 88% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Main Office safety composite

Main Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Main Office held a steady TCR band

Main Office's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Piperton, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 88% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/36
  • PHOTO VS-OH
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VS-OH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Main Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Main Office averages 2.5 TCR (88% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Main Office TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Main Office falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 36 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Tennessee.

Main Office (31 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Main Office
Main Office (31 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Main Office has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.1 3.0 2 0 0
2021 7.7 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2017 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · TN · Piperton

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 9 employers in Piperton, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VS-OH 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Castle Contracting- Omaha,NE 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR R & B Contracting, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ADS LLC 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Humboldt Hatchery 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cairo Farmers Gin, LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0000000932 WATER/SEWER-SEWER FCLTY MAINT 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE George W Reagan Company 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Location 273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pyramex Safety 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crown Lift Trucks Memphis 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shelby Group International, Inc. (Piperton) 104 FTE
NAT-TCR NP Santa Fe LLC, dba Santa Fe Station Hotel & Casino 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Greensboro Store #1606 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pyrotek Columbia City 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR NP Palace LLC - dba Palace Station Hotel & Casino 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Windsorwood Place 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bodensteiner Implement Company Dyersville Location 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bellofram Acquisition II LLC, DBA Whittle & Neher Company 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookfield 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.